
It
is with
a wry
smile,
noting
the
irony,
that I
observe
the
barometer
of
Evertonian
glee
towards
the
recent
takeover
of
Manchester
United
by that
lifelong
follower
of all
things
Man Utd
and avid
fan,
Malcolm
Glazer.
This is
the man,
one
presumes,
who will
saddle
United
with so
much
debt and
in the
process
turn one
of the
game’s
very few
plc
successes
into one
man’s
plaything.
His
deafening
silence
since
placing
United
alongside
Tampa
Bay
Buccaneers
upon his
mantelpiece
continues
to
infuriate
passionate
Mancunians
— a
predicament
which
brings
out a
smile,
or two,
on most
Evertonian
faces.
I
also
imagine
there’s
a fair
percentage
of
Evertonians
out
there
who hope
and pray
that
Malcolm
Glazer
(the
Devil
Incarnate
apparently)
realises
his
ambition
and
attains
the
necessary
90%
acquisition
of
grubby
Manchester
United
plc
shares,
taking
United
out of
the
public
domain
and very
much
into his
already
ample-sized
back
pocket,
a
compulsory
purchase
of the
last
remaining
10% of
shares
now
looming
on the
horizon.
United
fans
(and
shareholders)
may
protest
all they
like,
parading
some
rather
fetching
“Not
For
Sale!”
banners,
a
declaration
‘from
the
heart’
that ‘their’
club —
floated
now for
the past
fourteen
years on
the
PUBLIC
Stock
Exchange
—
cannot
possibly
fall
into the
hands of
some God
damn
crazy
Yank
without
interest
or love
of the
game.
Sorry,
United
fans and
shareholders
— it
can!
And it
has.
Most
Evertonians
will
look on
with
great
amusement
and
laugh at
United’s
potential
nightmare
in
waiting.
Serves
them
right,
yeah?
However,
could it
not be
argued
that
Everton
Football
Club
falls
quite
nicely
into the
“There
but for
the
grace of
God go
we”
category?
It’s
less
than one
year now
since
chairman
Bill
Kenwright
first
announced
the
imminent
arrival
of the
Fortress
Sports
Fund,
and
their
many
millions
of
pounds.
The
Fortress
Sports
Fund,
“an
absolute
possibility”
according
to the
Chairman,
would
see
Everton’s
coffers
swelled
with the
kind of
investment
previously
unheard
of at
Goodison
Park.
“Well
there’s
two
tranches…there’s
an
original
29.9%
and then
possibly
some
more.
So, you
know,
thirteen
to
fourteen
million
and then
another
fifteen
million
down the
line.
So there’s
a
possible
twenty
eight,
twenty
nine
million.”
the
Chairman
gleefully
declared,
live on
BBC
Radio
5Live,
in an
interview
with
Jonathan
Pearce.
It was
music to
the ears
of
Evertonians
everywhere.
We could
now shop
at
Harrods
instead
of
trawling
the
bargain
bins at
KwikSave.
Most
Evertonians
don’t
care a
jot
about
who owns
the Club
— that’s
a
long-standing
fact of
life.
So long
as we’ve
got a
manager
with
funds in
place
and we’re
flying
high in
the
League,
no-one’s
bothered
to ask
questions
over the
origins
of this
“investment”.
When the
Chairman
spoke of
impending
investment,
amounting
to many
millions,
most
Evertonians
were not
concerned
about
the
implications
—
simply,
show us
the
money,
get it
spent,
and let’s
see some
of those
galactico-type
players
donning
the
famous
Royal
Blue
jersey.
Oh, and
can we
have
fashionable
Nike
shirts
please?
What
didn’t
concern
most was
the
imminent
arrival
of
Fortress
Sports
Fund
(whoever
they may
be)
actually
gaining
an
initial
29.9%
ownership
of the
Club —
“our”
Club;
the
supposed
“People’s
Club”.
All we
read
over the
weeks,
which
became
months,
were
tales of
finding
investment
—
particularly
to
support
David
Moyes in
his
quest to
strengthen
an
already
weakened
squad.
This
Fortress
investment
would
then,
over
time,
become a
50.1%
interest
in the
Club.
Now I am
not the
greatest
mathematician
in the
world
but
50.1% in
my book
is a
controlling
interest.
It begs
questions,
of such
a great
Evertonian,
the
Chairman
– why
flog the
family
silver
to
parties
unknown
(overseas
division)?
What
benefits
Everton
Football
Club
from
selling
control
of the
Club to
these
people?
What
was to
be
gained
by
placing
Everton
FC, an
established
football
institution
since
1878, in
the
hands of
— and
at the
mercy of
— a
collection
of “investors”
hiding
behind
this
moniker,
the
Fortress
Sports
Fund?
Mr
Samuelson,
wheeled
out to
perform
before
the
shareholders
at the
last
AGM,
tried to
convince
those
present
on the
night
(failing
miserably)
that
Fortress
did not
want a
return
on their
investment
in
Everton
FC.
And pigs
may fly,
Mr
Samuelson!
You want
to “invest”
an
initial
£12.8M,
then
over
time
increasing
that
amount,
acquiring
over 50%
of the
Club
into the
bargain
yet gain
no
return?
Almost
too good
to be
true!
Explaining
Fortress’
position,
Mr.
Samuelson
said,
“We
originally
were
asked,
would
we buy
out
True
Blue
Holdings'
shareholding
of 72%
and we
responded
to
that
by
saying
‘No’,
having
looked
at the
financials
and
everything
else
we
felt
the
club
needed
the
money
—
NEW
money
going
INTO
the
club,
and
that
was
our
whole
basis
on
which
we
negotiated
— to
put
new
money
in.
And in
fact,
the
share
price,
which
had
been
used,
was
exactly
the
same
share
price
as
True
Blue
had
paid
originally
for
the
shares.
“So,
no
change
in
that
at
all,
we
just
used
that
as the
arbitrary
value,
then
it was
a
question
of how
MUCH
money,
well,
we
cannot
go
beyond
29.9%
because
of the
fact
that
the
club
falls
under
what
we
call
the
Blue
Book,
which
regulates
people,
organisations
or
businesses
which
have
raised
money
from
the
general
public,
even
although
they
are
not
listed
on any
Stock
Exchange.
So, we
were
limited
to
that
amount,
and
that
so,
sort
of led
us to
the
fact
that,
that
equated
to
£12.8
million
pounds
and
that
was
exactly
what
we
then
agreed
to
raise,
which
we
have
raised
by the
way
— we
are
just
waiting
on the
last
regulatory
approval
for
the
money
to go
into
the
fund,
and
I'll
explain
a
little
bit
about
the
structure
of the
fund
—
the
fund
is an
umbrella
fund,
we
call
it,
technically,
in
technical
terms,
a
protected-cell
fund,
and
the
only
reason
it in
Brunei,
is
that
it's
the
best
jurisdiction
and
the
right
laws
to use
for
this
kind
of
structure.
“It
is
also a
place
where
I
happen
to
have
one of
my
offices,
so it
is
easy
or
relatively
easy
for us
to
do.
Brunei
is a
new
financial
services
centre
in the
world;
they've
spent
a huge
amount
of
money
putting
the
infrastructure
into
place.
In
fact,
the
Fortress
Sports
Fund
is the
FIRST
fund,
and
the
first
protected-cell
fund
ever
set up
in
Brunei,
which
is one
of the
reasons
this
has
taken
slightly
longer
than
one
had
expected.
We
have
drawn
on
investors
from
my
side
and
from
Kevin
Neal's
side,
who we
know
well,
to put
the
money
into
the
fund.
Yes,
we
have
an
option
to put
more
money
in,
the
club
has an
option
to
accept
it or
not,
but
we're
not
looking,
in any
way
for
control
of
Everton
Football
Club.”
So
there
you have
it, the
intentions
of Mr
Samuelson
and his
band of
unnamed
investors
(all
lifelong
followers
of
Everton?).
They
simply
wanted
to
invest
whatever
29.9% of
Everton
Football
Club
would
cost
them —
regulations
in
accordance
with the
Blue
Book
preventing
them
from
making a
greater
initial
bid.
Interesting
though
to hear
Mr
Samuelson
state
that
True
Blue
Holdings
had made
initial
contact
with
regards
to
selling
the
entire
72%
controlling
interest
of a
club
riddled
with
debt —
a
comment
immediately
refuted
by
chairman
Bill
Kenwright.
Someone
somewhere
being
rather
economical
with the
truth
– be
that the
Chairman
or his
would-be
investor,
Mr
Samuelson
and
Messrs
Unknown.
With
an
initial
29.9%
chunk of
“our”
(sic)
Club
tucked
away
nicely
and two
seats on
our
Board,
what’s
to say
that
Fortress
Sports
Fund
would
not
then, as
promised,
further
pump
money
into the
Club —
their
investment
bulldozing
their
way to a
50.1%
stake in
“our”
Club.
The
Chairman,
using
the
Official
Website,
stated “The
Fortress
Sports
Fund
deal is
great
because
the deal
is very
simple.
Let’s
get on
with it.
I hope
we’re
all
convinced.”
Interviewed
only
last
week in
the London
Evening
Standard,
he once
again
confirmed
that
talks
with
Fortress
“and
other
parties”
remain
“on-going”.
Like
many
other
shareholders
at
Everton,
I remain
anything
but
convinced
that the
Fortress
Sports
Fund is
good for
the
Club.
I also
don’t
see it
as being
very
simple.
And most
important
of all I
do not
see it
being
beneficial
to
Everton
Football
Club.
Is it
unreasonable
therefore
to ask
what’s
the
difference
between
this
Fortress
Sports
Fund
wrestling
eventual
control
of “our”
Club and
Glazer’s
acquisition
of
Manchester
United?
Would
Evertonians
readily
embrace
the
notion
of
Malcolm
Glazer
swapping
a
Superbowl
for a
comfy
seat in
Goodison’s
Main
Stand?
I doubt
it very
much so
why
should
we be so
apathetic
to the
potential
for
Fortress
to
acquire
“our”
Club for
relative
small
change?
We
joyfully
look on
at
Manchester
United’s
current
woes,
them
being a
club
suddenly
plunged
into a
debt
beyond
their
wildest
dreams,
fear
arising
from not
fully
knowing
the
motives
of their
new
owner(s).
Laugh
all you
like but
one day,
if Bill
Kenwright
was to
succeed
in
pushing
through
the
Fortress
“investment”,
who
knows
what
future
lies in
waiting
for “our”
Club.
Could we
hold
Messrs
Samuelson,
Neal and
Unknown
accountable
from
afar in
the
event of
problems
arising
at
Everton?
I doubt
it.
Oddly
enough,
and
somewhat
perverse
for
those
who
avail of
every
opportunity
to
deride
the man,
it’s
the
figure
of “non-Evertonian”
Paul
Gregg
who has
put the
brakes
on this
would-be
“investment”
coming
into
Everton
Football
Club.
That’s
right,
the man
who
supposedly
has ne’er
a drop
of
Everton
blood
coursing
through
his
veins is
the one
man
inside
our
Boardroom
who has
thus far
prevented
a “Malcolm
Glazer”
style
gradual
takeover
of “our”
Club.
I
do hope
that
this
fact
earns
appreciation
amongst
the
Evertonian
community
who
currently
mock our
rivals
at
United
yet see
Mr Gregg
as the
bad guy
at
Goodison
—
albeit
the bad
guy who
backed
Mr
Kenwright
financially
and
otherwise
when
extracting
the Club
from
Johnson’s
grasp,
back in
the days
before
the
machinations
of True
Blue
Holdings
saw Mr
Gregg
reduced
to being
an
increasingly
frustrated
director
unable
to
challenge
the
Kenwright/Woods
axis.
How many
shareholders,
small or
otherwise,
have we
at
Everton
Football
Club who
are
aware of
the
threat
posed by
accepting
anything
from
Fortress
Sports
Fund?
If
we were
to take
Fortress
at face
value (“Every
fund
invests
ultimately
for some
gain,
but one
of the
reasons
my
investors
are
investing,
is
exactly
the same
reason
YOU have
invested
— we
want to
see a
highly
successful
club —
we're
not
looking
to realise
a huge
sum of
money at
all,
we're
just
simply
there to
stand
behind
and
watch
the club
grow and
be
successful.”
—
Christopher
Samuelson,
AGM,
December
7, 2004)
and
unequivocally
support
the
Chairman
in his
desire
to push
this
through,
how then
would we
then
feel if
faced
with a
possible
scenario,
seeing
Fortress,
in
compliance
with
company
law,
making
compulsory
purchases
of the
remaining
shares
in the
Club?
As
far-fetched
as that
may
sound to
some
Evertonians,
it
remains
a
possibility.
If True
Blue
Holdings
had
remained
intact,
it’s
quite
likely
we’d
be on
the road
already
to a
position
not too
dissimilar
to what’s
now
happening
at Old
(Sold?)
Trafford.
The
dissolution
of True
Blue
Holdings
afforded
Paul
Gregg an
opportunity
to look
after
number
one, so
to
speak, to
ensure
his own
shareholding
in
Everton
Football
Club
remained
undiluted.
That
stance
has thus
far
prevented
Everton
from
becoming
the
plaything
for
overseas
investors.
Irony is
it not
for
those
who
place
“Blue
Bill”
up on
high?
Only
last
December
did we
hear the
Chairman,
again
using
the
Official
Website,
state
“I
hope
that
with the
investment
of
Fortress
Sports
Fund
more
peaceful
times
are in
the
offing.
We’ve
got to
have
investment
because
we need
to
generate
as many
income
streams
as
possible."
I concur
wholeheartedly,
Mr.
Chairman.
Everton
Football
Club
does
need to
generate
as many
income
streams
as
possible.
Instead
of
forever
targeting
those
people
who
follow
the Club
both
home and
away
with
increased
season
ticket
prices
(the
dramatic
increase,
70%, for
kids
renewing
a good
example)
why not
target
the
wider
Everton
fan
base,
scattered
globally?
We are,
after
all,
supposedly
“The
People’s
Club”.
Does
it not
make
more
sense,
even
through
the most
Blue
tinted
of
glasses,
to
afford
Evertonians
the
opportunity
to
invest
in “our”
Club
instead
of
attempting
to pawn
off the
Club to
overseas
investors
and
collectively
Messrs
Unknown?
There
but for
the
grace of
God.
Or Paul
Gregg…