I
didn’t
know
whether
to laugh
or cry
after
feasting
my eyes
upon
David
Prentice’s
examination
of
Everton
Football
Club’s
financial
prosperity
(or lack
of) in
the Liverpool
Echo
(here).
Has he
replaced
Ian Ross
as
Everton's
Head of
Public
Communications?
Kenny
Fogarty
has
already
written
a fine
piece on
this
matter elsewhere
but,
like a
moth
drawn
closer
to the
light, I
too felt
that Mr
Prentice’s
article
was
worthy
of some
closer
examination,
viewed
as it
was via
my own
perceived
curmudgeonly
eyes!
WHETHER
Champions
League
qualification
is
assured
or
not,
the
2004-05
season
has
already
proved
a
success
story
for
Everton
Football
Club.
Can
anyone
truly
disagree
with
this?
Hand on
heart,
the
answer
must be
no.
Most of
us all
feared
the
worst
this
season,
after
the
summer
we had
last
year.
It might
well
rankle
with
those
who
refuse
to
accept
we’ve
still
got
major
problems
at
Everton
that it
is
actually
possible
to enjoy
what’s
happened
on the
pitch
this
season
and
separate
that
from the
off-field
activities
and not
actually
be a “Red
in
disguise”
or a “disgrace
to the
name
Evertonian”.
I’ve
enjoyed
some
wonderful
moments
this
season
– be
it
last-minute
goals,
derby-day
winners,
the team
finding
themselves
confounding
everyone
and
sitting
second
in the
League.
We’ve
punched
above
our
weight.
And know
what?
It’s
been
bloody
wonderful!
It’s
been
great to
see a
smile
returning
to
Evertonian
faces.
However,
scratch
beneath
the
surface
and see
if you
can
honestly
see a
Club
reborn
and back
where we
believe
it
belongs,
“success”
built on
the
strength
of a
plan to
regenerate
the
Club, on
and off
the
field.
Yet
it was
built
on the
shakiest,
most
unlikely
foundations
imaginable.
The
Blues
ended
last
season
with
the
lowest
effective
points
total
in the
club's
history,
trooping
into
the
close
season
shell-shocked
on the
back
of a
5-1
thumping
at
Manchester
City.
But,
if
Blues
fans
believed
a
three-month
break
from
football
would
offer
them
respite,
they
were
proved
spectacularly
wrong.
Bill
Kenwright
attempted
to
streamline
and
modernise
the
club
at
boardroom
level,
moving
long-serving
chairman
Sir
Philip
Carter
and
director
Keith
Tamlin
into
non-executive
positions
and
replacing
chief
executive
Michael
Dunford
with
renowned
football
firefighter
Trevor
Birch.
Streamline
and
modernise
the Club
at
boardroom
level?
Oh the
pen is
mightier
than the
sword
and
history
rewritten!
Last
summer
we
witnessed
Paul
Gregg
finally
end his
silence
to
publicly
air his
frustrations
with his
fellow
True
Blue
Holdings
directors
and
comment
on the
unfolding
mess at
Goodison
Park –
our debt
continuing
to
spiral
leaving
the Club
haemorrhaging
finances
at an
alarming
rate,
with the
necessary
sale of
a
certain
Wayne
Rooney a
last
throw of
the
dice.
Paul
Gregg
remains
equally
as
culpable
as those
directors
(Bill
Kenwright
and Jon
Woods)
he now
appears
to
oppose
for the
mess we’ve
found
ourselves
in over
recent
years.
Voting
patterns
within
the
make-up
of TBH
left
Gregg
increasingly
frustrated
with his
inability
to
improve
matters
at the
Club as he
saw
fit.
The Gang
of One
outnumbered
by the
Gang of
Two!
Thems
the
vagaries
of a
three-man
democracy…
Philip
Carter
finally
removed
his head
from the
sand
knowing
his time
was up
and
readily
accepted
the
token
gesture
that is
his
current
position
as a
Life
President
of the
Club.
I still
chuckle
at Mr
Carter’s
cursory
dismissal
twelve
months
ago of a
proposal
to
initiate
investment
from the
wider
Everton
fanbase
– “it
is best
that the
matter
be put
on the
back
burner.”
Like
most
things
over
recent
seasons
–
stick
them on
the back
burner
and pray
things
improve
on the
pitch to
detract
from the
shortcomings
off
it?
Youth
Academy?
Bellefield?
Ground
redevelopment?
How many
more
years
must we
wait
before
something/anything
is done
to
improve
matters
in these
areas?
These
issues
were
concerning
Evertonians
back in
the days
of one
Peter
Johnson.
What
improvements
have
been
made
since
Johnson’s
exit?
A cynic
might
offer
that the
only
growth
over
recent
seasons
has been
the Club’s
debt.
Despite
having
conducted
life-saving
surgery
on
Chelsea
and
Leeds
United,
Birch
lasted
little
more
than
six
weeks
at
Goodison
before
resigning.
It was
the
start
of a
spectacular
summer
of
discontent.
Director
Paul
Gregg,
previously
a
sleeping
partner
in the
boardroom,
decided
to
adopt
a more
vigorous
role.
Frustrated
by a
lack
of
progress
in
solving
the
growing
financial
crisis
at
Goodison,
he
announced
plans
of his
own to
invest
£15m
into
the
club,
but on
the
condition
Kenwright
stepped
aside.
Kenwright
refused
until
he had
seen
evidence
of
Gregg's
funding
- and
the
identity
of his
backers.
Then a
crisis
descended
into a
farce.
Gregg
revealed
former
Blues
director
Lord
Grantchester
as his
backer.
The
Lord
released
a
statement
claiming
he
hadn't
even
seen
Gregg's
proposals,
then
changed
his
mind
just
hours
later,
saying
he
still
wanted
to see
True
Blue
Holdings
dissolved.
That
dissolution
duly
took
place,
but
only
after
an
airclearing
EGM
had
been
called
by
concerned
shareholders.
'Airclearing'
is not a
word I
would
ever
associate
with
that
EGM, Mr.
Prentice.
“Concerned
shareholders”
were
informed
on that
night
– by
the new
Chairman
– that
investment
was
incoming
via our
new
friend,
Mr
Samuelson
and his
Fortress
Sports
Fund:
“The
reported
deal,
the
Fortress
Sports
Fund, is
an
absolute
possibility
and
hopefully
will be
sewn up
in the
next few
weeks.”
We still
await
further
development
on that
front.
He also
spoke
that
night
about
the
Youth
Academy –
“The
plan is,
in fact,
to have
two
academies
now, as
Manchester
United
do, as
Arsenal
do.
Maybe
have an
academy
for 6 to
12 year
olds and
maybe
another
academy
for
teenagers.”
We still
await
development
on that
front.
He
stated
that the
Board
endorsed
greater
communications
with the
shareholders
– “The
Board
welcomes
the
initiative
of the
Shareholders.”
We still
await
development
on that
front
too.
While
flak
was
flying
in the
boardroom,
on the
pitch
Wayne
Rooney
was
proving
his
status
as a
world
class
striker
at the
European
Championships
in
Portugal.
But
Evertonians
looked
on
more
in
apprehension
than
admiration.
Newcastle
United
and
then
Manchester
United
lodged
formal
bids
for
England's
star
of
Euro
2004,
and
the
player
himself
made
it
clear
he
wanted
to
abandon
what
he
perceived
to be
a
sinking
ship.
Indeed.
True, it
did end
up that
way, the
kid who
became
The Boy
wanted
out.
That was
also the
advice
he was
receiving
at the
time –
from his
agent,
from his
teammates
and from
many
pundits
who all
reckoned
his
career
was best
served
elsewhere.
Of
course,
Everton
Football
Club
never
wanted
to sell
the
lad.
Nor were
we in a
position
whereby
his sale
was a
necessary
evil!
That’s
the way
it was
spun at
the
time.
Ignore
the
rumours
indicating
that
Manchester
United
had
already
won the
day to
sign the
lad –
Newcastle’s
name
thrown
into the
equation
simply
to add
some
dressing
to a
farce of
a
transfer.
Ignore
the fact
that Tim
Howard,
on a
pre-season
tour of
the
United
States
with
Manchester
United,
in the
first
week of
July,
had
already
spoken
of
United’s
attack
for this
season
(2004/05)
including
Rooney
alongside
Van
Nistelrooij,
Saha and
Smith!
Ignore
the fact
that
Everton’s
merchandise
catalogue
included
next to
nothing
by way
of
Rooney
merchandise.
Ignore
the fact
that
Everton
had
received
an “increase
in
borrowings”
from
Singer
and
Friedlander
back in
February
and paid
it back
a mere
fourteen
days
after
Rooney
became
that
horrible
little
Judas.
The one
fact you’ll
rarely
see
aired is
that
Rooney’s
necessary
sale
bailed
Everton
out of
the shit
and
saved
the “sinking
ship”
from
crashing
upon a
rock
marked
Administration.
He
wasn't
alone.
Tomasz
Radzinski
followed,
and
with
the
paltry
additions
of
striking
journeyman
Marcus
Bent,
for
£450,000,
and
unproven
midfielder
Tim
Cahill,
for
£1.7m,
Everton
were
widely
tipped
to go
down.
Instead,
they
flourished.
Kenwright
announced
the
Fortress
Sports
Fund
rescue
package
on the
eve of
the
new
season.
It
couldn't
help
Everton
in
their
opening
day
clash
with
champions
Arsenal,
but
salvation
wasn't
far
away.
The
same
players
who
had
struggled
to
just
above
the
drop
zone
the
previous
season,
showed
a
steely
siege
mentality,
found
a
formation
which
ideally
suited
the
personnel
at
hand -
and
upset
the
accepted
order
of the
Premiership
by
lodging
themselves
in the
top
four.
It was
a
renaissance
which
was
reflected
off
the
field,
too,
in the
hands
of an
ambitious
and
progressive
new
chief
executive,
Keith
Wyness.
He
arrived
from
Aberdeen,
was
introduced
to
supporters
at the
EGM,
then
just
three
months
later,
at the
AGM,
drew
widespread
praise
for
his
financial
presentation
on how
he
intended
to
improve
the
club's
financial
performance.
He
appears
to
have
been
as
good
as his
words.
"This
time
last
year
the
tag
would
have
been
'cash-strapped
Everton',
now it
would
be
'resurgent
Everton',"
he
declared
proudly
this
week.
"In
terms
of
financial
off-field
performance
that
is
definitely
the
case.
We
have
started
to put
in
place
some
initiatives
which,
in a
commercial
sense,
will
be
leaders
in
their
own
right.
We are
planning
some
projects
internationally
that
will
be the
first
of
their
kind.
And
that
is all
going
to
help
us
move
things
forward."
It’s
amusing
to see
the
words
Fortress
Sports
Fund
sitting
prettily
near the
word
flourished!
A review
of
Everton’s
financial
standing
by the
local
newspaper
and only
one
reference
throughout
to the
never-ending
saga
that
Fortress
Sports
Fund has
become.
Priceless.
Why
so?
Straight
from the
back
pages of
the
Liverpool
Echo (5
Feb
2005)
– “FSF
had
promised
the
Blues
money
before
Christmas.
There
have
been a
long
list of
complex
excuses
and
delays
from
Samuelson
for its
non-arrival
-
leaving
many
Blues
fans
cynical
it will
ever now
materialise.”
Is
the
Fortress
Sports
Fund
investment
central
to this
off
field
“renaissance”
or has
this
rebirth
of the
Blues
uncovered
funds
from
beneath
different
rocks?
This ‘cynical’
Evertonian
would
like to
hit the
refresh
button
and
remind a
few
people
of the
words
Chris
Samuelson
had to
offer
last
January,
when
interviewed
by the
Daily
Post’s
Andy
Kelly:
Q.
When
will
the
proposed
deal
by
Fortress
to buy
into
Everton
FC
finally
materialise?
Chris
Samuelson:
“I
have
been
in
Brunei
this
week
and
around
95% of
the
deal
is now
done.
I will
be in
Brunei
today
meeting
the
regulator
when
the
remaining
5%
should
be
sorted
out.
It
relates
to the
wording
governing
the
management
company
of the
fund.
Once
that
is
done,
the
money
will
go
into
the
fund
within
a few
days
and
certainly
by the
end of
the
week.
Everton
will
then
need
to
call
an
Emergency
General
Meeting
(EGM)
for
shareholders
to
agree
the
deal.
That
takes
a
month
so we
are
probably
looking
at the
third
week
of
February
before
the
money
actually
reaches
the
club.
But if
(club
banker)
Barclays
are
assured
the
deal
is
going
through
then I
am
sure
they
will
make
the
money
available
earlier.”
Q.
How
certain
are
you
that
the
Everton
board
will
approve
the
Fortress
deal?
CS:
“Well
I am
sure
Bill
Kenwright
and
John
Woods
will
support
it,
which
is
around
40% of
the
shareholders.
I have
seen
various
rumours
on
websites
about
what
Mr
Gregg
is
likely
to do
but he
is
only a
minority
shareholder.
We
need
50% of
support
from
those
who
actually
vote
and,
if we
get
it,
that
takes
care
of
that.”
Q:
Who
are
the
investors
involved
in
Fortress?
CS:
“They
are a
collection
of
individuals
- not
many,
less
than
10 -
who
are
keen
on
football
and
follow
Everton.
I am
legally
not
allowed
to
reveal
their
identities
and
they
prefer
to
keep a
low
profile
but I
am
sure a
few of
them
will
make
themselves
known
of
their
own
accord
in
time.
They
are
very
supportive
and of
course
there
is the
option
for
more
money
to
arrive
later.”
Q:
Why is
the
deal
being
done
through
Brunei?
CS:
“I
have
just
set up
an
office
in
Brunei
and we
elected
to do
it
here
because
they
have
very
good
laws
in
relation
to
cell
funds
which
is the
method
we are
using.
Basically
the
vehicle
is a
fund
of
funds
and
one of
those
funds
is
doing
the
Everton
transaction.”
Q:
Why
have
there
been
so
many
delays
with
Fortress?
CS:
“I
understand
the
fans'
frustration
and I
am
just
as
frustrated.
This
is the
first
fund
of
this
type
which
has
been
done
in
Brunei
under
new
legislation
so it
takes
time.
Also
the
official
who
was
handling
our
application
went
back
to New
Zealand
for
family
reasons
but he
is now
back
in his
office.
I have
made
it
very
clear
to the
Brunei
authorities
that
it is
very
urgent
and we
need
their
full
co-operation
and
they
have
been
very
co-operative.”
There
is no
doubt
that
Chris
Samuelson
talks
a good
game
but
Everton
fans
will
want
to see
the
colour
of his
money
before
making
a
final
judgment.
The
financier,
though,
believes
the
signs
are
good.
He
said:
"As
I was
changing
flights
at
Singapore
Airport
this
week,
I went
into a
bar
for a
drink.
It had
footballs
as
seats
and on
the TV
they
were
showing
a
replay
of the
Everton
v
Plymouth
game.
I
thought
that
was a
very
good
omen."
A
very
good
omen?
Sorry Mr
Samuelson
but the
last
good
omen I
saw
involved
the
shooting
dead of
Gregory
Peck as
he was
about to
slay the
anti-christ!
Wyness
also
revealed
that
David
Moyes
would
have a
significant
transfer
fund
at his
disposal
this
summer
. . .
NOT
purely
as a
result
of the
£27m
sale
of
Wayne
Rooney.
"Yes,
David
will
have a
significant
transfer
fund,"
he
explained
"probably
something
close
to
£30m
to
spend
during
the
summer.
"But
supporters
must
understand
the
split.
Say
£12m
of
that
is
transfer
money,
the
rest
would
be
needed
for
wages
- and
there
are
about
a
dozen
players
who
have
still
not
signed
new
deals.
"It
is a
good
picture,
but it
is
also
prudent
and
within
what
is
sensible.
This
is not
money
we are
going
to be
borrowing,
which
is
very
important.
This
is
money
in
front
of
us.
The
only
debt
the
club
is
committed
to now
is the
long
term
securitisation
loan -
£2.5m
a year
-
which
is
manageable.
The
overdraft
is
very
manageable
and we
only
use it
when
we
need
to for
cash
flow
purposes.
Anything
we are
spending
now is
controlled.
We are
not
borrowing
to
spend."
Why
has a
definite
figure
of £27m
been
mentioned
in
reference
to our
annual
“significant”
transfer
fund?
The
first
tranche
of
Rooney
transfer
money
went
straight
back to
Singer
and
Friedlander
and
there
are
grounds
for
argument
that the
Beattie
money
was a
loan
advanced
on the
strength
of the
second
instalment
of
Rooney
money
due.
Furthermore,
it will
take a
series
of
astounding
results
for us
to
secure
this
touted
figure
of
£27m.
The
small
print in
the
transfer
indicated
the
following:
…..
Contingent
payments
of up
to
£7.0m
payable
on the
occurrence
of the
following
events
during
the
next 5
years
-
Even
if
these
events
do not
occur,
Everton
will
receive
£3.0m
provided
Rooney
remains
registered
to
Manchester
United
until
30th
June
2007.
This
sum
will
be
payable
in
equal
instalments
of
£1.0m
on 1st
August
2006,
2007
and
2008
if not
already
paid
via
the
above
incentives.
If
the
player
is
transferred
from
Manchester
United
then
Everton
will
receive
25% of
any
excess
sum
over
all
amounts
paid
under
this
agreement.
…..
So,
with a
little
“luck”
we might
see
United
finishing
second
this
season
and also
lifting
the FA
Cup,
thereby
“earning”
Everton
FC a
further
£0.4m!
I’m
certain
Arséne
Wenger
might be
an
interested
spectator
when
United
come to
Goodison
on April
20!
Is
this
figure
of £30m
that is
being
mentioned
(plucked
from the
ether?)
courtesy
of our
friends
in
Geneva
or is it
from an
alternative
source?
Is it
dependant
on
Everton
securing
safe
passage
to the
group
stages
of next
season’s
Champions
League?
I
presume
it’s
not
normal
practise
for a
Club to
publicly
declare
what
lies in
their
“significant”
transfer
fund for
the
summer
ahead.
With
news of
further
massive
price
hikes in
season
tickets
around
the
corner
it does
no harm
whatsoever
to
indicate
“significant”
amounts
of money
being
made
available
for the
manager
this
summer.
It
remains
to be
seen, of
course,
whether
or not
David
Moyes
does
indeed
get his
hands on
this
significant
amount
of cash
already
mentioned
by the
CEO.
It is
the
least he
deserves.
He has
done a
superb
job this
past
year and
I’ll
be
gutted
for him
if we
run out
of steam
(and
points!)
with the
finish
line in
sight.
It can
be a
cruel
frustrating
game at
times
and
Evertonians
are
hurting
right
now,
fearful
of a
repeat
of 2003.
If
it
happens
then so
be it.
In
the
meantime,
as fans
we shit
bricks!
Wonder
could
those
shit
bricks
build a
new
stadium?